who is really being protected when you disarm the public?

! !!!!!9787
CLICK on the above picture to read a survey of current and retired police officers and what they REALLY think about guns in the hands of law abiding citizens.

With all of this talk about gun control, I have to ask this simple question: WHO are we really trying to protect? According to a recent survey of police officers… it seems that if we are really trying to protect people then we should allow law abiding citizens the right to carry.

Speaking of insanity, have you noticed that it is always the places that guns are forbidden that have the most violence. It doesn’t matter if it is a city, a school, a theater or a university ( the latest was a crazy with a knife)… but if someone is looking to hurt others they look for safe, unarmed, soft targets.

So then, who is really being protected when the majority of Americans become disarmed? The answer is quite simple… those with guards and guns.

CLICK to read the survey

it was safer in the old west

People had been entering the Santa Maria (California) Gun show since 8am... it was 10am and we were have way back in the line!
People had been entering  the Santa Maria (California) Gun show  since 8am… it was 10am and we were half way back in the line!

I was looking for a little ammunition and I was a bit curious as to what — if any- rifles would be available at the Gun show this year. The truth is that they had a wide assortment, a lot of old ‘collectable’ pieces and some new hunting rifles and shotguns… even a few pistols from the 1860’s were on display. If you are familiar with a ‘Broom handle’ gun from the turn of the 1900’s (made better known by the last Sherlock Holmes movie)… there were even a few of these. Prices overall were high, but understandable given the high demand.

Contrary to what you might see at elbow throwing Costco or at Target’s grab bag… people at the gun show were polite, courteous and respectful and open to conversation. This stirred a question in my mind… Were these just good people or did the fact that various guns were hanging about keep them well mannered? Pardner, it was probably a little of both.

So, I decided to do a little scanning of history and it seems that the most violent and dangerous places on earth were the cities where existing prohibitions against self defense made life difficult for the common person. This encouraged opportunistic groups of men to prey on the unarmed. After a time folks looked for ways to even the odds, firearms were called an ‘equalizer” a way one person could defend themselves from multiple or stronger  assailants. Women today are the biggest growing group purchasing handguns… one little lady can make a mess out of a few men attempting to do dastardly things to her person!

I also ran across a quote by Mark Twain that raised a smile:

“I have carried a revolver; lots of us do, but they are the most innocent things in the world.” — Mark Twain

It doesn’t take a genius to see where the most dangerous places in America exist; they are where firearms are most restricted.

The most violent areas in America are those with the most firearm restrictions! (Yellow and black)
The most violent areas in America are those with the most firearm restrictions! (Yellow and black) New York, Chicago, Washington DC, Baltimore, Los Angeles, Oakland are just a few of the deadly metro areas offering safe havens to criminals and the criminally insane.

So, was it really safer in the old west? I think so… when the bad guys have to worry about whether or not you are armed… bad things just don’t happen as much. So, if we are trying to make American’s ‘safer’, then the past can give us a suggestion… I mean we are trying to make people safer, aren’t we?